<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://herbalscienceresearch.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Herbal Science Research - systematic review</title>
 <link>http://herbalscienceresearch.com/taxonomy/term/27/0</link>
 <description></description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Herbal medicines in the treatment of psychiatric disorders: a systematic review.</title>
 <link>http://herbalscienceresearch.com/node/781</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?tmpl=NoSidebarfile&amp;amp;db=PubMed&amp;amp;cmd=Retrieve&amp;amp;list_uids=17562566&amp;amp;dopt=Abstract&quot;&gt;Herbal medicines in the treatment of psychiatric disorders: a systematic review.&lt;/a&gt;: Phytother Res. 2007 Aug;21(8):703-16  Authors:  Sarris J&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This paper reports a critical review of 27 herbal medicines and formulas in treating a broad range of psychiatric disorders (in addition to anxiety and depression), including obsessive-compulsive, seasonal affective, bipolar depressive, psychotic, phobic and somatoform disorders. Ovid Medline, Pubmed and the Cochrane Library were searched for pharmacological and clinical evidence of herbal medicines with psychotropic activity. A forward search of later citations was also conducted. Whilst substantial high-quality evidence exists for the use of kava and St John&#039;s wort in the treatment of anxiety and depression respectively, currently there is insufficient robust clinical evidence for the use of many other herbal medicines in psychiatric disorders. Phytotherapies which potentially have significant use in psychiatry, and urgently require more research are Rhodiola rosea (roseroot) and Crocus sativus (saffron) for depression; Passiflora incarnata (passionflower), Scutellaria lateriflora (scullcap) and Zizyphus jujuba (sour date) for anxiety disorders; and Piper methysticum (kava) for phobic, panic and obsessive-compulsive disorders. While depression and anxiety are commonly researched, the efficacy of herbal medicines in other mental disorders requires attention. The review addresses current issues in herbal psychotherapy: herbal safety, future areas of application, the relationship of herbal medicine with pharmaceuticals and the potential prescriptive integration of phytomedicines with synthetic psychotropic medicines. Particular attention is given to clinical and safety issues with St John&#039;s wort and kava.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;PMID: 17562566 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://herbalscienceresearch.com/keyword/psychopharmacology">psychopharmacology</category>
 <category domain="http://herbalscienceresearch.com/keyword/systematic-review">systematic review</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2007 05:48:23 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Site Editor</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">781 at http://herbalscienceresearch.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>[...] Nonpharmacological and Nonsurgical Interventions for Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis: An Overview of Systematic Reviews</title>
 <link>http://herbalscienceresearch.com/node/768</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?tmpl=NoSidebarfile&amp;amp;db=PubMed&amp;amp;cmd=Retrieve&amp;amp;list_uids=17906290&amp;amp;dopt=Abstract&quot;&gt;Effectiveness of Nonpharmacological and Nonsurgical Interventions for Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis: An Overview of Systematic Reviews.&lt;/a&gt;: Phys Ther. 2007 Sep 25;  Authors:  Christie A, Jamtvedt G, Dahm KT, Moe RH, Haavardsholm EA, Hagen KB&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;CONCLUSIONS:based on systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials are considered to provide the highest level of evidence about the effectiveness of an intervention. This overview summarizes the available evidence from systematic reviews on the effects of nonpharmacological and nonsurgical interventions for rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Systematic reviews of studies of patients with RA (aged &amp;gt;18 years) published between 2000 and 2007 were identified by comprehensive literature searches. Methodological quality was independently assessed by 2 authors, and the quality of evidence was summarized by explicit methods. Pain, function, and patient global assessment were considered primary outcomes of interest. Twenty-eight systematic reviews were included in this overview. High-quality evidence was found for beneficial effects of joint protection and patient education, moderate-quality evidence was found for beneficial effects of herbal therapy (gamma-linolenic acid) and low-level laser therapy, and low-quality evidence was found for the effectiveness of the other interventions. The quality of evidence for the effectiveness of most nonpharmacological and nonsurgical interventions in RA is moderate to low.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;PMID: 17906290 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://herbalscienceresearch.com/keyword/anti-inflammatory">anti-inflammatory</category>
 <category domain="http://herbalscienceresearch.com/keyword/systematic-review">systematic review</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2007 05:42:36 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Site Editor</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">768 at http://herbalscienceresearch.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>&#039;Complementary ENT&#039;: a systematic review of commonly used supplements.</title>
 <link>http://herbalscienceresearch.com/node/743</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?tmpl=NoSidebarfile&amp;amp;db=PubMed&amp;amp;cmd=Retrieve&amp;amp;list_uids=17125579&amp;amp;dopt=Abstract&quot;&gt;&#039;Complementary ENT&#039;: a systematic review of commonly used supplements.&lt;/a&gt;: J Laryngol Otol. 2007 Aug;121(8):779-82  Authors:  Karkos PD, Leong SC, Arya AK, Papouliakos SM, Apostolidou MT, Issing WJ&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;OBJECTIVE: To assess the evidence surrounding the use of certain complementary supplements in otolaryngology. We specifically focussed on four commonly used supplements: spirulina, Ginkgo biloba, Vertigoheel and nutritional supplements (cod liver oil, multivitamins and pineapple enzyme). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic review of the English and foreign language literature. Inclusion criteria: in vivo human studies. Exclusion criteria: animal trials, in vitro studies and case reports. We also excluded other forms of &#039;alternative medicine&#039; such as reflexology, acupuncture and other homeopathic remedies. RESULTS: Lack of common outcome measures prevented a formal meta-analysis. Three studies on the effects of spirulina in allergy, rhinitis and immunomodulation were found. One was a double-blind, placebo, randomised, controlled trial (RCT) of patients with allergic rhinitis, demonstrating positive effects in patients fed spirulina for 12 weeks. The other two studies, although non-randomised, also reported a positive role for spirulina in mucosal immunity. Regarding the use of Ginkgo biloba in tinnitus, a Cochrane review published in 2004 showed no evidence for this. The one double-blind, placebo-controlled trial that followed confirmed this finding. Regarding the use of Vertigoheel in vertigo, two double-blind RCTs and a meta-analysis were identified. The first RCT suggested that Vertigoheel was equally effective in reducing the severity, duration and frequency of vertigo compared with betahistine. The second RCT suggested that Vertigoheel was a suitable alternative to G. biloba in the treatment of atherosclerosis-related vertigo. A meta-analysis of only four clinical trials confirms that Vertigoheel was equally effective compared with betahistine, G. biloba and dimenhydrinate. Regarding multivitamins and sinusitis, two small paediatric pilot studies reported a positive response for chronic sinusitis and otitis media following a course of multivitamins and cod liver oil. Regarding bromelain (pineapple enzyme) and sinusitis, one randomised, multicentre trial including 116 children compared bromelain monotherapy to bromelain with standard therapy and standard therapy alone, for the treatment of acute sinusitis. The bromelain monotherapy group showed a faster recovery compared with the other groups. CONCLUSION: The positive effects of spirulina in allergic rhinitis and of Vertigoheel in vertigo are based on good levels of evidence, but larger trials are required. There is overwhelming evidence that G. biloba may play no role in tinnitus. There is limited evidence for the use of multivitamins in sinus symptoms, and larger randomised trials are required.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;PMID: 17125579 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://herbalscienceresearch.com/keyword/respiratory">respiratory</category>
 <category domain="http://herbalscienceresearch.com/keyword/systematic-review">systematic review</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 19:01:36 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Site Editor</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">743 at http://herbalscienceresearch.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The use of herbal medicines in early drug development for the treatment of HIV infections and AIDS.</title>
 <link>http://herbalscienceresearch.com/node/728</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.hubmed.org/display.cgi?uids=17714022&quot;&gt;The use of herbal medicines in early drug development for the treatment of HIV infections and AIDS.&lt;/a&gt;: Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2007 Sep; 16(9): 1355-64  Liu J
&lt;p&gt;This review systematically assesses the beneficial and harmful effects of herbal medicines in people with HIV infection and AIDS. Based on a Cochrane review and updated searches, the author identifies the available evidence on herbal medicines compared with placebo or antiretroviral drugs in patients with HIV infection, HIV-related disease or AIDS. There are ten randomised controlled trials, involving 571 individuals with HIV infection or AIDS, that met the inclusion criteria. Some herbal medicines, such as IGM-1 seem to be effective in symptom improvement, but generally no significant effect on antiviral or immunity enhancement among reviewed herbs was seen. Combined treatment of Chinese herbal medicine, SH and antiretroviral agents showed increased antiviral benefit compared with antiretrovirals alone. These findings suggest beneficial effects from some of the tested herbs but more evidence from larger studies are needed to support this evidence in the future.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://herbalscienceresearch.com/keyword/hiv">HIV</category>
 <category domain="http://herbalscienceresearch.com/keyword/immunity">immunity</category>
 <category domain="http://herbalscienceresearch.com/keyword/systematic-review">systematic review</category>
 <pubDate>Sat, 22 Sep 2007 18:10:56 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Site Editor</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">728 at http://herbalscienceresearch.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Ayurvedic and collateral herbal treatments for hyperlipidemia: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials [...]</title>
 <link>http://herbalscienceresearch.com/node/725</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.hubmed.org/display.cgi?uids=17658119&quot;&gt;Ayurvedic and collateral herbal treatments for hyperlipidemia: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials and quasi-experimental designs.&lt;/a&gt;:  Altern Ther Health Med. 2007 Jul-Aug; 13(4): 22-8  Singh BB, Vinjamury SP, Der-Martirosian C, Kubik E, Mishra LC, Shepard NP, Singh VJ, Meier M, Madhu SG
&lt;p&gt;BACKGROUND: Ischemic heart disease (IHD) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in both developing and developed countries. An underlying cause of IHD involves retention and deposit of serum lipids in coronary arteries, decreasing blood flow. Drugs (conventional and herbal) are used to lower levels of serum cholesterol to help prevent IHD. The Ayurvedic medicine pharmacopoeia identified herbs that might contribute to a decrease in cholesterol and therefore reduce the risk of IHD. METHODS: Literature searches were conducted at 3 points: 2003, 2004, and 2007. Databases searched included PubMed, the National Library of Medicine, the National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine, Ovid, and EBSCO Information Services, and other search strategies also were used. Each article was assessed for quality by 3 people, and discrepancies were resolved by arbitration using a fourth person, who also read and scored each article. Additional assessments of safety using a scale and determination of reported efficacy/effectiveness of the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-experimental designs (QEDs) were made. RESULTS: RCTs generally received high quality scores and improved by decade of publication. More than 50% of garlic, more than 80% of guggul, and 100% of Arjuna RCTs reported product effectiveness. Safety scores did not improve by decade. The QEDs received medium and high quality scores, and 93% of them reported effectiveness. The QEDs had a higher mean score for safety reporting than the RCTs. CONCLUSIONS: Many studies received high quality scores and noted safety information and reported effectiveness or efficacy in a clear manner. This finding was not consistent with other systematic reviews that have found the highest reported efficacy/ effectiveness in studies of poorer quality. Ayurvedic herbs reviewed here should be considered by physicians when trying to manage hyperlipidemia in their patients.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://herbalscienceresearch.com/keyword/ayurveda">ayurveda</category>
 <category domain="http://herbalscienceresearch.com/keyword/cardiovascular">cardiovascular</category>
 <category domain="http://herbalscienceresearch.com/keyword/clinical-trial">clinical trial</category>
 <category domain="http://herbalscienceresearch.com/keyword/randomized-controlled-trial">randomized controlled trial</category>
 <category domain="http://herbalscienceresearch.com/keyword/systematic-review">systematic review</category>
 <pubDate>Sat, 22 Sep 2007 18:05:24 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Site Editor</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">725 at http://herbalscienceresearch.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Evolution of medical treatment for endometriosis: back to the roots?</title>
 <link>http://herbalscienceresearch.com/node/704</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.hubmed.org/display.cgi?uids=17575287&quot;&gt;Evolution of medical treatment for endometriosis: back to the roots?&lt;/a&gt;: Hum Reprod Update. 2007 Jun 16; Wieser F, Cohen M, Gaeddert A, Yu J, Burks-Wicks C, Berga SL, Taylor RN
&lt;p&gt;Experimental evidence is accumulating to suggest that medicinal botanicals have anti-inflammatory and pain-alleviating properties and hold promise for treatment of endometriosis. Herein, we present a systematic review of clinical and experimental data on the use of medicinal herbs in the treatment of endometriosis. Although there is a general lack of evidence from clinical studies on the potential efficacy of medicinal herbs for the treatment of endometriosis-associated symptoms, our review highlights the anti-inflammatory and pain-alleviating mechanisms of action of herbal remedies. Medicinal herbs and their active components exhibit cytokine-suppressive, COX-2-inhibiting, antioxidant, sedative and pain-alleviating properties. Each of these mechanisms of action would be predicted to have salutary effects in endometriosis. Better understanding of the mechanisms of action, toxicity and herb-herb and herb-drug interactions permits the optimization of design and execution of complementary alternative medicine trials for endometriosis-associated pain. A potential benefit of herbal therapy is the likelihood of synergistic interactions within individual or combinations of plants. In this sense, phytotherapies may be analogous to nutraceuticals or whole food nutrition. We encourage the development of herbal analogues and establishment of special, simplified registration procedures for certain medicinal products, particularly herbal derivates with a long tradition of safe use.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://herbalscienceresearch.com/keyword/systematic-review">systematic review</category>
 <category domain="http://herbalscienceresearch.com/keyword/women">women</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 18:36:22 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Site Editor</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">704 at http://herbalscienceresearch.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>An updated systematic review of the pharmacology of silymarin.</title>
 <link>http://herbalscienceresearch.com/node/698</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?tmpl=NoSidebarfile&amp;amp;db=PubMed&amp;amp;cmd=Retrieve&amp;amp;list_uids=17464157&amp;amp;dopt=Abstract&quot;&gt;An updated systematic review of the pharmacology of silymarin.&lt;/a&gt;: Forsch Komplementarmed. 2007 Apr;14(2):70-80  Authors:  Saller R, Melzer J, Reichling J, Brignoli R, Meier R&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;BACKGROUND: Recent years have seen an explosion of scientific papers that deal with drugs from the fruits of milk thistle and its active substances silymarin (standardized mixture of flavonolignanes), thus justifying an updated systematic review. METHODS: Electronic databases identified silymarin, silibinin, silicristin or milk thistle as descriptors in &amp;gt;700 papers (34% published in last 5 years; 92% dealt with animal pharmacological). Only papers adequately reporting on experimental conditions, dosing, variables tested and statistics were analysed. RESULTS: Silymarin was found to modify specifically the functions related to various transporters and receptors located in the cell membranes; that is, organic anion uptake transporter peptides (OATP), ABC transporters (P-gp), bile salt export pump, as well as TNF-alpha-dependent and possibly selectin-dependent phenomena. In the cytoplasm, some antioxidant properties and the inhibition of the lipoxygenase pathway seem quite selective and could concur to the antitoxic effects. Some effects like the inhibition of inducible nitric-oxide synthase, of nuclear factor kappa B, and reduction of collagen synthesis are indicative of DNA/RNA-mediated effects. Several studies using &#039;in vitro&#039; and &#039;in vivo&#039; cancer models suggest a potential of silymarin in such diseases. Topical and systemic silymarin has skin protective properties against UV-induced damage in epidermis and causes an up-regulation of tumour-suppressor genes p53- and p21CIP1. There were no data on hepatic viral replication, viremia or spontaneous tumours in the data examined. CONCLUSIONS: Data presented here do not solve the question about the complex mechanism(s) of action of the medicinal herbal drug silymarin. Silymarin may be a natural multi-functional and multi-target drug.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;PMID: 17464157 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://herbalscienceresearch.com/keyword/gastrointestinal">gastrointestinal</category>
 <category domain="http://herbalscienceresearch.com/keyword/pharmacology">pharmacology</category>
 <category domain="http://herbalscienceresearch.com/keyword/systematic-review">systematic review</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 18:19:17 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Site Editor</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">698 at http://herbalscienceresearch.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Complementary cancer therapy: a systematic review of prospective clinical trials on anthroposophic mistletoe extracts.</title>
 <link>http://herbalscienceresearch.com/node/665</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?tmpl=NoSidebarfile&amp;amp;db=PubMed&amp;amp;cmd=Retrieve&amp;amp;list_uids=17507307&amp;amp;dopt=Abstract&quot;&gt;Complementary cancer therapy: a systematic review of prospective clinical trials on anthroposophic mistletoe extracts.&lt;/a&gt;: Eur J Med Res. 2007 Mar 26;12(3):103-19  Authors:  Kienle GS, Kiene H&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;BACKGROUND: Anthroposophic Mistletoe therapy is a widely used complementary cancer treatment. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate prospective clinical trials on the effectiveness of anthroposophic mistletoe therapy for cancer. DESIGN: Systematic review. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Search of 9 electronic databases, reference lists and extensive expert consultations. Criteria-based assessment of methodological study quality. RESULTS: 16 randomized (RCT) and 9 non-randomized (N-RCT) controlled trials were identified that investigated mistletoe treatment of malignant diseases. Statistically significant benefit for survival was reported in 8 of 17 trials (in 5 of 10 RCTs), for disease-free survival and tumour recurrence in none of 2 RCTs, for remission of tumour and malignant effusion in 1 RCT and 1 N-RCT of 4 controlled trials, for quality of life (QoL) in 3 of 5 RCTs, and for QoL and reduction of side effects of cytoreductive therapies (chemotherapy, radiation or surgery) in 5 of 7 trials (3 of 5 RCTs). Methodological quality of the controlled trials differed substantially; some had major limitations while others were reasonably well conducted. 12 single-arm cohort studies were identified. 5 of 7 studies found substantial tumour remission in various cancers, one study reported remission of CIN, and 4 studies remission of malignant pleural effusion or ascites. Quality of reporting in cohort studies was mostly reasonably good. Mistletoe application was well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Regarding quality of studies and consistency of results, the best evidence for efficacy of mistletoe therapy exists for improvement of QoL and reduction of side effects of cytotoxic therapies (chemotherapy, radiation). Survival benefit has been shown but not beyond critique. Tumour remissions are described in cohort studies that investigate the application of high dose or local mistletoe extracts. As several reasonably well-conducted studies indicate beneficial effects, further properly designed trials should be encouraged to investigate clinical efficacy and its possible dependency on the mode of application.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://herbalscienceresearch.com/keyword/cancer">cancer</category>
 <category domain="http://herbalscienceresearch.com/keyword/systematic-review">systematic review</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2007 05:43:57 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Site Editor</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">665 at http://herbalscienceresearch.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>[Quality appraisal of systematic reviews or meta-analysis on traditional Chinese medicine published in Chinese journals]</title>
 <link>http://herbalscienceresearch.com/node/641</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?tmpl=NoSidebarfile&amp;amp;db=PubMed&amp;amp;cmd=Retrieve&amp;amp;list_uids=17526167&amp;amp;dopt=Abstract&quot;&gt;[Quality appraisal of systematic reviews or meta-analysis on traditional Chinese medicine published in Chinese journals]&lt;/a&gt;: Zhongguo Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Za Zhi. 2007 Apr;27(4):306-11  Authors:  Liu JP, Xia Y&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;OBJECTIVE: To critically assess the quality of literature about systematic review or meta-analysis on traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) published in Chinese journals. METHODS: Electronic searches in CNKI, VIP and Wanfang data-base were conducted to retrieve the systematic reviews or meta-analysis reports on TCM, including herbal medicine, needling, acupuncture and moxibustion, as well as integrative medicine, they were identified and extracted according to the 18 items of QUOROM (quality of reporting of meta-analyses) Statement and relative information. The appraisal was made taking the indexes mainly including objectives, source of data, methods of data extraction, quality assessment of the included studies, measurement data synthesis, etc. RESULTS: Eighty-two systematic reviews were identified, except 6 reviews were excluded for repeatedly published or didn&#039;t comply with the enrolled criterion, 76 reviews concerning 51 kinds of diseases were enrolled for appraisal. Among them, 70 reviews evaluated the efficacy of TCM, mainly on Chinese herbs and 9 on acupuncture and moxibustion. In majority of the reviews, randomised controlled trials were included and the data resources were described, but in 26 reviews only the Chinese databases were searched and the description about data extraction and analysis method were too simple; and 70% of reviews assessed the quality of the included studies; none used flow chart to express the process of selection, inclusion and exclusion of studies. CONCLUSIONS: Few reviews or Meta-analysis reports reached the international standard and there is insufficient description of methodology for conducting systematic reviews, so it is hardly to be repeated. The authors suggested that advanced methodological training is necessary for reviewers.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://herbalscienceresearch.com/keyword/chinese-incl-tcm">chinese (incl. TCM)</category>
 <category domain="http://herbalscienceresearch.com/keyword/informatics">informatics</category>
 <category domain="http://herbalscienceresearch.com/keyword/meta-analysis">meta-analysis</category>
 <category domain="http://herbalscienceresearch.com/keyword/systematic-review">systematic review</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 01:12:40 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Site Editor</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">641 at http://herbalscienceresearch.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Osteoarthritis and nutrition. From nutraceuticals to functional foods: a systematic review of the scientific evidence.</title>
 <link>http://herbalscienceresearch.com/node/604</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?tmpl=NoSidebarfile&amp;amp;db=PubMed&amp;amp;cmd=Retrieve&amp;amp;list_uids=16859534&amp;amp;dopt=Abstract&quot;&gt;Osteoarthritis and nutrition. From nutraceuticals to functional foods: a systematic review of the scientific evidence.&lt;/a&gt;: Arthritis Res Ther. 2006;8(4):R127 Authors:  Ameye LG, Chee WS&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://arthritis-research.com/content/8/4/R127&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query/egifs/http:--www.biomedcentral.com-graphics-pubmed-art-free.gif&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;/&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pubmed&amp;amp;pubmedid=16859534&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query/egifs/http:--www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov-corehtml-pmc-pmcgifs-pubmed-pmc.gif&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;/&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The scientific and medical community remains skeptical regarding the efficacy of nutrition for osteoarthritis despite their broad acceptation by patients. In this context, this paper systematically reviews human clinical trials evaluating the effects of nutritional compounds on osteoarthritis. We searched the Medline, Embase, and Biosis databases from their inception to September 2005 using the terms random, double-blind method, trial, study, placebo, and osteoarthritis. We selected all peer-reviewed articles reporting the results of randomised human clinical trials (RCTs) in osteoarthritis that investigated the effects of oral interventions based on natural molecules. Studies on glucosamine and chondroitin sulfate were excluded. The quality of the RCTs was assessed with an osteoarthritic-specific standardised set of 12 criteria and a validated instrument. A best-evidence synthesis was used to categorise the scientific evidence behind each nutritional compound as good, moderate, or limited. A summary of the most relevant in vitro and animal studies is used to shed light on the potential mechanisms of action. Inclusion criteria were met by 53 RCTs out of the 2,026 identified studies. Good evidence was found for avocado soybean unsaponifiables. Moderate evidence was found for methylsulfonylmethane and SKI306X, a cocktail of plant extracts. Limited evidence was found for the Chinese plant extract duhuo jisheng Wan, cetyl myristoleate, lipids from green-lipped mussels, and plant extracts from Harpagophytum procumbens. Overall, scientific evidence exists for some specific nutritional interventions to provide symptom relief to osteoarthritic patients. It remains to be investigated whether nutritional compounds can have structure-modifying effects.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://herbalscienceresearch.com/keyword/nutrition">nutrition</category>
 <category domain="http://herbalscienceresearch.com/keyword/systematic-review">systematic review</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2007 15:31:02 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Site Editor</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">604 at http://herbalscienceresearch.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Traditional chinese medicine for the treatment of chronic prostatitis in China: a systematic review and meta-analysis.</title>
 <link>http://herbalscienceresearch.com/node/583</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?tmpl=NoSidebarfile&amp;amp;db=PubMed&amp;amp;cmd=Retrieve&amp;amp;list_uids=17034282&amp;amp;dopt=Abstract&quot;&gt;Traditional chinese medicine for the treatment of chronic prostatitis in China: a systematic review and meta-analysis.&lt;/a&gt;: J Altern Complement Med. 2006 Oct;12(8):763-9  Authors:  Chen JX, Hu LS&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;OBJECTIVE: To systematically evaluate the effectiveness of Chinese herbal medicine for treating chronic prostatitis (CPT) in China. DESIGN: Electronic medical database from China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) was searched, language is Chinese; date is from January 1, 1994 to December 31, 2003. A total of 108 trials were found, and all studies with words like &quot;randomization&quot; or &quot;quasi-randomization&quot; in their abstracts were included, whether they used blinding or not. Nineteen theses that met the entry criteria were downloaded and fully printed. Four groups were divided: Chinese herbs orally treated group (based on syndrome differentiation), Chinese herbs externally treated group, Chinese herbs orally and externally treated group, and integrated Western with Chinese herbs treated group. RESULTS: All 19 articles that met the entry criteria were clinical trial studies with low quality (Jadad Score &amp;lt;3). The results showed that Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) may benefit the patients who had CPT. However, from the results of the funnel plots analysis of all four groups of clinical trials that met the inclusion criteria in this systematic review are distant asymmetrical and irregular plots, which indicate that a positive publication bias may exist. There was no obvious evidence indicating that the efficacy of the therapy in the treated groups using TCM was superior to that of the control group (Western medicine treatment group). CONCLUSIONS: All of the four groups in the clinical trials have not provided evidence of evidence-based medicine (EBM) A class (including 1a, 1b, 1c level), failed to prove that the TCM may have beneficial effects for patients with CPT, because of low quality in all the trials and a positive publication bias. Therefore, in light of some positive outcomes, a good design of multicentered, randomized, parallel-controlled and blinding trials is needed in order to make further studies, and deserve further examination for the treatment of CPT with TCM.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://herbalscienceresearch.com/keyword/chinese-incl-tcm">chinese (incl. TCM)</category>
 <category domain="http://herbalscienceresearch.com/keyword/meta-analysis">meta-analysis</category>
 <category domain="http://herbalscienceresearch.com/keyword/prostate">prostate</category>
 <category domain="http://herbalscienceresearch.com/keyword/systematic-review">systematic review</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 16:55:00 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Site Editor</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">583 at http://herbalscienceresearch.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Tongxinluo (Tong xin luo or Tong-xin-luo) capsule for unstable angina pectoris.</title>
 <link>http://herbalscienceresearch.com/node/546</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?tmpl=NoSidebarfile&amp;amp;db=PubMed&amp;amp;cmd=Retrieve&amp;amp;list_uids=17054205&amp;amp;dopt=Abstract&quot;&gt;Tongxinluo (Tong xin luo or Tong-xin-luo) capsule for unstable angina pectoris.&lt;/a&gt;: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;(4):CD004474 Authors:  Wu T, Harrison RA, Chen X, Ni J, Zhou L, Qiao J, Wang Q, Wei J, Xin D, Zheng J&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;BACKGROUND: Tongxinluo capsule is a medicine consisting of traditional Chinese herbs and insects used for cardiovascular diseases in China and some other Asian countries. To date the evidence of its effect has not previously been subject to systematic review, making it difficult to derive robust conclusions about its actual benefits, and indeed, possible harms. OBJECTIVES: To assess systematically the effects of tongxinluo capsule in people with unstable angina pectoris. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) on The Cochrane Library, Issue 4 2004, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Chinese Biomedical Database, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Japana Centra Revuo Medicina (all 1995 to 2005). We also handsearched the relevant Chinese journals, checked with manufacturers and registers of ongoing studies. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised trials comparing either tongxinluo capsule only or standard treatment plus tongxinluo capsule with standard treatment or other anti-angina pectoris drugs, placebo or no intervention. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors identified relevant studies for the review independently and went on to abstract data, and assess trial quality. Authors of included studies were contacted to obtain further information as required. MAIN RESULTS: 18 short term follow-up trials involving 1413 people were included. The studies did not provide strong support of a benefit of tongxinluo for reducing the combined outcome of acute myocardial infarction, angioplasty (PTCA) coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) and sudden death or all-cause mortality (RR 0.42, 95% CI 0.07 to 2.59, P=0.35; RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.01to 7.78, P=0.49, respectively). Tongxinluo reduced the frequency of acute angina attacks (WMD -1.20, 95%CI -1.38 to -1.02, P&amp;lt;0.00001 and RR -2.36, 95%CI -2.53 to -2.18, P&amp;lt;0.00001, respectively), improved ECG (RR 1.31, 95% CI 1.08 to 1.57, P=0.005) and angina symptoms (RR 1.21, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.40; P=0.007). AUTHORS&#039; CONCLUSIONS: Tongxinluo in combination with routine angina therapy appears to reduce the risk of subsequent AMI, PTCA or CABG, angina attacks and severity, as well as improving symptoms and ischaemic changes on the electrocardiogram (ECG). Due to the methodological limitations of the studies, the evidence is insufficient to make any conclusive recommendations about the use of this treatment for patients presenting with unstable angina. Large high quality randomised controlled trials are warranted.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://herbalscienceresearch.com/keyword/cardiovascular">cardiovascular</category>
 <category domain="http://herbalscienceresearch.com/keyword/chinese-incl-tcm">chinese (incl. TCM)</category>
 <category domain="http://herbalscienceresearch.com/keyword/systematic-review">systematic review</category>
 <pubDate>Sat, 20 Jan 2007 16:19:34 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Site Editor</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">546 at http://herbalscienceresearch.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Evidence-based systematic review of saw palmetto by the Natural Standard Research Collaboration.</title>
 <link>http://herbalscienceresearch.com/node/538</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?tmpl=NoSidebarfile&amp;amp;db=PubMed&amp;amp;cmd=Retrieve&amp;amp;list_uids=17022925&amp;amp;dopt=Abstract&quot;&gt;Evidence-based systematic review of saw palmetto by the Natural Standard Research Collaboration.&lt;/a&gt;: J Soc Integr Oncol. 2006;4(4):170-86 Authors:  Ulbricht C, Basch E, Bent S, Boon H, Corrado M, Foppa I, Hashmi S, Hammerness P, Kingsbury E, Smith M, Szapary P, Vora M, Weissner W&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Here presented is an evidence-based systematic review including written and statistical analysis of scientific literature, expert opinion, folkloric precedent, history, pharmacology, kinetics/dynamics, interactions, adverse effects, toxicology, and dosing.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://herbalscienceresearch.com/keyword/adverse-effects">adverse effects</category>
 <category domain="http://herbalscienceresearch.com/keyword/interaction">interaction</category>
 <category domain="http://herbalscienceresearch.com/keyword/posology">posology</category>
 <category domain="http://herbalscienceresearch.com/keyword/prostate">prostate</category>
 <category domain="http://herbalscienceresearch.com/keyword/systematic-review">systematic review</category>
 <category domain="http://herbalscienceresearch.com/keyword/toxicology">toxicology</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 18:42:13 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Site Editor</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">538 at http://herbalscienceresearch.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Herbal Medicine for Low Back Pain: A Cochrane Review.</title>
 <link>http://herbalscienceresearch.com/node/502</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?tmpl=NoSidebarfile&amp;amp;db=PubMed&amp;amp;cmd=Retrieve&amp;amp;list_uids=17202897&amp;amp;dopt=Abstract&quot;&gt;Herbal Medicine for Low Back Pain: A Cochrane Review.&lt;/a&gt;: Spine. 2007 Jan 1;32(1):82-92 Authors:  Gagnier JJ, van Tulder MW, Berman B, Bombardier C&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;STUDY DESIGN.: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials. OBJECTIVES.: To determine the effectiveness of herbal medicine compared with placebo, no intervention, or &quot;standard/accepted/conventional treatments&quot; for nonspecific low back pain. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA.: Low back pain is a common condition and a substantial economic burden in industrialized societies. A large proportion of patients with chronic low back pain use complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) and/or visit CAM practitioners. Several herbal medicines have been purported for use in low back pain. METHODS.: The following databases were searched: Medline (1966 to April 2003), Embase (1980 to April 2003), Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (Issue 1, 2003), and Cochrane Complementary Medicine (CM) field Trials Register. Additionally, reference lists in review articles, guidelines, and in the retrieved trials were checked. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), using adults (&amp;gt;18 years of age) suffering from acute, subacute, or chronic nonspecific low back pain. Types of interventions included herbal medicines defined as a plant that is used for medicinal purposes in any form. Primary outcome measures were pain and function. Two reviewers (J.J.G. and M.W.T.) conducted electronic searches in all databases. One reviewer (J.J.G.) contacted content experts and acquired relevant citations. Authors, title, subject headings, publication type, and abstract of the isolated studies were downloaded or a hard copy was retrieved. Methodologic quality and clinical relevance were assessed separately by two individuals (J.J.G. and M.W.T.). Disagreements were resolved by consensus. RESULTS.: Ten trials were included in this review. Two high-quality trials utilizing Harpagophytum procumbens (Devil&#039;s claw) found strong evidence for short-term improvements in pain and rescue medication for daily doses standardized to 50 mg or 100 mg harpagoside with another high-quality trial demonstrating relative equivalence to 12.5 mg per day of rofecoxib. Two moderate-quality trials utilizing Salix alba (White willow bark) found moderate evidence for short-term improvements in pain and rescue medication for daily doses standardized to 120 mg or 240 mg salicin with an additional trial demonstrating relative equivalence to 12.5 mg per day of rofecoxib. Three low-quality trials using Capsicum frutescens (Cayenne) using various topical preparations found moderate evidence for favorable results against placebo and one trial found equivalence to a homeopathic ointment. CONCLUSIONS.: Harpagophytum procumbens, Salix alba, and Capsicum frutescens seem to reduce pain more than placebo. Additional trials testing these herbal medicines against standard treatments will clarify their equivalence in terms of efficacy. The quality of reporting in these trials was generally poor; thus, trialists should refer to the CONSORT statement in reporting clinical trials of herbal medicines.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://herbalscienceresearch.com/keyword/herbal">herbal</category>
 <category domain="http://herbalscienceresearch.com/keyword/neurologic">neurologic</category>
 <category domain="http://herbalscienceresearch.com/keyword/review">review</category>
 <category domain="http://herbalscienceresearch.com/keyword/systematic-review">systematic review</category>
 <pubDate>Sat, 06 Jan 2007 00:09:18 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Site Editor</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">502 at http://herbalscienceresearch.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Valerian for sleep: a systematic review and meta-analysis.</title>
 <link>http://herbalscienceresearch.com/node/466</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?tmpl=NoSidebarfile&amp;amp;db=PubMed&amp;amp;cmd=Retrieve&amp;amp;list_uids=17145239&amp;amp;dopt=Abstract&quot;&gt;Valerian for sleep: a systematic review and meta-analysis.&lt;/a&gt;: Am J Med. 2006 Dec;119(12):1005-12  Authors:  Bent S, Padula A, Moore D, Patterson M, Mehling W&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Insomnia affects approximately one-third of the adult population and contributes to increased rates of absenteeism, health care use, and social disability. Extracts of the roots of valerian (Valeriana officinalis) are widely used for inducing sleep and improving sleep quality. A systematic review of randomized, placebo-controlled trials of valerian for improving sleep quality is presented. An extensive literature search identified 16 eligible studies examining a total of 1093 patients. Most studies had significant methodologic problems, and the valerian doses, preparations, and length of treatment varied considerably. A dichotomous outcome of sleep quality (improved or not) was reported by 6 studies and showed a statistically significant benefit (relative risk of improved sleep = 1.8, 95% confidence interval, 1.2-2.9), but there was evidence of publication bias in this summary measure. The available evidence suggests that valerian might improve sleep quality without producing side effects. Future studies should assess a range of doses of standardized preparations of valerian and include standard measures of sleep quality and safety.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://herbalscienceresearch.com/keyword/herbal">herbal</category>
 <category domain="http://herbalscienceresearch.com/keyword/meta-analysis">meta-analysis</category>
 <category domain="http://herbalscienceresearch.com/keyword/systematic-review">systematic review</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 18:53:58 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Site Editor</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">466 at http://herbalscienceresearch.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The role of complementary and alternative therapies in cardiac rehabilitation: a systematic evaluation.</title>
 <link>http://herbalscienceresearch.com/node/361</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?tmpl=NoSidebarfile&amp;amp;db=PubMed&amp;amp;cmd=Retrieve&amp;amp;list_uids=16449858&amp;amp;dopt=Abstract&quot;&gt;The role of complementary and alternative therapies in cardiac rehabilitation: a systematic evaluation.&lt;/a&gt;: Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2006 Feb;13(1):3-9  Authors:  Arthur HM, Patterson C, Stone JA&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;BACKGROUND: Presently, complementary and alternative medicine, including both therapies and herbal/oral supplements, is used globally. Few studies have examined the use of specific therapies, separate from herbal/oral supplements, in cardiac rehabilitation. This paper presents a systematic evaluation of current research evidence related to use of specific complementary and alternative medicine therapies in secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease, with a view to making recommendations for cardiac rehabilitation. DESIGN AND METHODS: A literature search was conducted using complementary and alternative medicine websites, Medline, Allied and Complementary Medicine, CINAHL, Cochrane databases, EMBASE, SportDiscus, Clinical Evidence, and Evidence-Based Practice to locate research-based scientific evidence related to the use of complementary and alternative medicine in cardiac rehabilitation. Search keywords included heart, cardiac, cardiovascular, coronary, myocardial and rehabilitation, combined with particular therapies. Herbal/oral supplements were not included in this evaluation. RESULTS: Some complementary and alternative medicine therapies may be useful to patients by themselves or coupled with traditional cardiac rehabilitation. Tai chi, as a complement to existing exercise interventions, can be utilized for low and intermediate risk patients. transcendental meditation may be used as a stress reduction technique. There was insufficient evidence found for the use of acupuncture or chelation therapy in cardiac rehabilitation or secondary prevention. CONCLUSIONS: Some complementary and alternative medicine therapies hold promise for patients in cardiac rehabilitation. Further research is essential, however, in all areas of complementary and alternative medicine to confirm its usefulness as an adjunct to cardiac rehabilitation.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://herbalscienceresearch.com/keyword/cardiovascular">cardiovascular</category>
 <category domain="http://herbalscienceresearch.com/keyword/systematic-review">systematic review</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jun 2006 07:14:16 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Site Editor</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">361 at http://herbalscienceresearch.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Systematic review: complementary and alternative medicine in the irritable bowel syndrome.</title>
 <link>http://herbalscienceresearch.com/node/345</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?tmpl=NoSidebarfile&amp;amp;db=PubMed&amp;amp;cmd=Retrieve&amp;amp;list_uids=16441466&amp;amp;dopt=Abstract&quot;&gt;Systematic review: complementary and alternative medicine in the irritable bowel syndrome.&lt;/a&gt;: Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2006 Feb;23(4):465-71  Authors:  Hussain Z, Quigley EM&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Background Complementary and alternative medical therapies and practices are widely employed in the treatment of the irritable bowel syndrome. Aim To review the usage of complementary and alternative medicine in the irritable bowel syndrome, and to assess critically the basis and evidence for its use. Methods A systematic review of complementary and alternative medical therapies and practices in the irritable bowel syndrome was performed based on literature obtained through a Medline search. Results A wide variety of complementary and alternative medical practices and therapies are commonly employed by irritable bowel syndrome patients both in conjunction with and in lieu of conventional therapies. As many of these therapies have not been subjected to controlled clinical trials, some, at least, of their efficacy may reflect the high-placebo response rate that is characteristic of irritable bowel syndrome. Of those that have been subjected to clinical trials most have involved small poor quality studies. There is, however, evidence to support efficacy for hypnotherapy, some forms of herbal therapy and certain probiotics in irritable bowel syndrome. Conclusions Doctors caring for irritable bowel syndrome patients need to recognize the near ubiquity of complementary and alternative medical use among this population and the basis for its use. All complementary and alternative medicine is not the same and some, such as hypnotherapy, forms of herbal therapy, specific diets and probiotics, may well have efficacy in irritable bowel syndrome. Above all, we need more science and more controlled studies; the absence of truly randomized placebo-controlled trials for many of these therapies has limited meaningful progress in this area.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://herbalscienceresearch.com/keyword/clinical-trial">clinical trial</category>
 <category domain="http://herbalscienceresearch.com/keyword/gastrointestinal">gastrointestinal</category>
 <category domain="http://herbalscienceresearch.com/keyword/herbal">herbal</category>
 <category domain="http://herbalscienceresearch.com/keyword/systematic-review">systematic review</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jun 2006 04:35:01 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Site Editor</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">345 at http://herbalscienceresearch.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Echinacea for preventing and treating the common cold.</title>
 <link>http://herbalscienceresearch.com/node/328</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?tmpl=NoSidebarfile&amp;amp;db=PubMed&amp;amp;cmd=Retrieve&amp;amp;list_uids=16437427&amp;amp;dopt=Abstract&quot;&gt;Echinacea for preventing and treating the common cold.&lt;/a&gt;: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;(1):CD000530 Authors:  Linde K, Barrett B, W&amp;ouml;lkart K, Bauer R, Melchart D&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;BACKGROUND: Preparations of the plant Echinacea (family Compositae) are widely used in some European countries and in North America for common colds. Most consumers and physicians are not aware that products available under the term Echinacea differ appreciably in their composition, mainly due to the use of variable plant material, extraction methods and addition of other components. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this review was to assess whether there is evidence that Echinacea preparations are 1) more effective than no treatment; 2) more effective than placebo; 3) similarly effective to other treatments in A) the prevention and B) the treatment of the common cold. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library Issue 3, 2005); PubMed (1997 to April 2005), EMBASE (1998 to June 2005), AMED (to August 2005), Centre for Complementary Medicine Research (in Munich) (1988 to May 2005), contacted experts, and screened references of reviews. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomized controlled trials that compared mono-preparations of Echinacea with a placebo, no treatment, or another treatment for the prevention or treatment of common colds. Trials on combinations of Echinacea and other herbs were excluded. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: For all studies, at least two authors independently assessed eligibility and trial quality, and extracted data. Outcomes of interest in prevention trials were: numbers of individuals with one or more colds, and severity and duration of colds; and in treatment trials: total symptom scores, nasal symptoms, and duration of colds. MAIN RESULTS: Sixteen trials including a total of 22 comparisons of an Echinacea preparation and a control group (19 with placebo, 2 with no treatment, 1 with another herbal preparation) met the inclusion criteria. All trials except one were described as double-blind. The majority had reasonable to good methodological quality. Three comparisons investigated prevention of colds and 19 comparisons tested treatment of colds. A variety of different Echinacea preparations were used. None of the three comparisons in the prevention trials showed an effect over placebo. Comparing an Echinacea preparation with placebo as treatment, a significant effect was reported in nine comparisons, a trend in one, and no difference in six. More than one trial was available only for preparations based on the aerial parts from Echinacea purpurea (E. purpurea). AUTHORS&#039; CONCLUSIONS: Echinacea preparations tested in clinical trials differ greatly. There is some evidence that preparations based on the aerial parts of Echinacea purpurea might be effective for the early treatment of colds in adults but results are not fully consistent. Beneficial effects of other Echinacea preparations, and for preventative purposes might exist but have not been shown in independently replicated, rigorous randomized trials.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://herbalscienceresearch.com/keyword/clinical-trial">clinical trial</category>
 <category domain="http://herbalscienceresearch.com/keyword/herbal">herbal</category>
 <category domain="http://herbalscienceresearch.com/keyword/randomized-controlled-trial">randomized controlled trial</category>
 <category domain="http://herbalscienceresearch.com/keyword/systematic-review">systematic review</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jun 2006 04:30:36 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Site Editor</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">328 at http://herbalscienceresearch.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Herbal remedies for anxiety - a systematic review of controlled clinical trials.</title>
 <link>http://herbalscienceresearch.com/node/305</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?tmpl=NoSidebarfile&amp;amp;db=PubMed&amp;amp;cmd=Retrieve&amp;amp;list_uids=16428031&amp;amp;dopt=Abstract&quot;&gt;Herbal remedies for anxiety - a systematic review of controlled clinical trials.&lt;/a&gt;: Phytomedicine. 2006 Feb;13(3):205-8  Authors:  Ernst E&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Anxiety is a prominent indication for herbal medicine. This systematic review was therefore aimed at summarising the evidence for or against the anxiolytic efficacy of such treatments. Six databases were searched for all randomised clinical trials testing herbal monopreparations in the alleviation of anxiety. Seven such studies and one systematic review were located. Eight different herbals were studied. The herbal medicines, which, according to these data are associated with anxiolytic activity in humans, are Piper methysticum and Bacopa monniera. Only for kava were independent replications available. It was concluded that there is a lack of rigorous studies in this area and that only kava has been shown beyond reasonable doubt to have anxiolytic effects in humans.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://herbalscienceresearch.com/keyword/herbal">herbal</category>
 <category domain="http://herbalscienceresearch.com/keyword/randomized-controlled-trial">randomized controlled trial</category>
 <category domain="http://herbalscienceresearch.com/keyword/systematic-review">systematic review</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jun 2006 04:25:26 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Site Editor</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">305 at http://herbalscienceresearch.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Alternative therapies for postmenopausal women.</title>
 <link>http://herbalscienceresearch.com/node/259</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?tmpl=NoSidebarfile&amp;amp;db=PubMed&amp;amp;cmd=Retrieve&amp;amp;list_uids=16279503&amp;amp;dopt=Abstract&quot;&gt;Alternative therapies for postmenopausal women.&lt;/a&gt;: Int J Fertil Womens Med. 2005 May-Jun;50(3):101-14  Authors:  Speroff L&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Alternative therapies are being used by postmenopausal women in attempts to treat all of the complaints and medical conditions of the menopause. One-fifth of those who take prescription drugs for these indications also take herbal remedies and/or high-dose vitamins, most often without disclosing the fact to the physician. Although studies of alternative therapies are short-term and rarely focused on safety--let alone efficacy--in the long-term, there are many studies spread over the large number of substances involved. More than 130 studies, including meta-analyses, are reviewed in this article under the headings of phytoestrogens, especially from soy; therapies for hot flushes; and preventives for cardiovascular disease, osteoporosis, and breast cancer. Special attention is given to the recently recognized daidzein metabolite equol, and for the sake of completeness there are reviews of the unconventional, but not botanical, treatments estriol, transdermal progesterone, and dehydroepiandrosterone. The total picture produced by conscientious review of the studies is bleak overall, but there seems to be good reason to pursue the possibilities inherent in soy protein with phytoestrogens in populations of women who endogenously produce equol.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://herbalscienceresearch.com/keyword/herbal">herbal</category>
 <category domain="http://herbalscienceresearch.com/keyword/menopause">menopause</category>
 <category domain="http://herbalscienceresearch.com/keyword/phytoestrogen">phytoestrogen</category>
 <category domain="http://herbalscienceresearch.com/keyword/systematic-review">systematic review</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jun 2006 04:12:39 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Site Editor</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">259 at http://herbalscienceresearch.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Natural health product-drug interactions: a systematic review of clinical trials.</title>
 <link>http://herbalscienceresearch.com/node/216</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?tmpl=NoSidebarfile&amp;amp;db=PubMed&amp;amp;cmd=Retrieve&amp;amp;list_uids=16175124&amp;amp;dopt=Abstract&quot;&gt;Natural health product-drug interactions: a systematic review of clinical trials.&lt;/a&gt;: Ther Drug Monit. 2005 Oct;27(5):549-57  Authors:  Mills E, Wu P, Johnston BC, Gallicano K, Clarke M, Guyatt G&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Interactions between natural health products (NHP) and prescription medications are of increasing concern. This paper aims to identify all clinical trials of NHP-drug interactions. To determine the prevalence and outcomes of clinical investigations of NHP-drug pharmacokinetic interactions, electronic databases were searched from inception through March 2004, as well as reference lists from published reports and experts in the field for unpublished studies. Eligible studies were clinical investigations of the interaction between a NHP and the metabolism of a regulated medication in humans. Studies were excluded that only investigated the metabolism of an NHP or examined food-drug or NHP-NHP interactions. Two reviewers selected studies for inclusion and independently extracted data. Forty-seven trials were identified, studying an average of 14 participants/study (95% confidence interval [CI] 11-18), examined drug interactions with 19 different herbal preparations. All trials were pharmacokinetic studies, 41 of healthy volunteers and 6 of patients. Ten different herbal medicines as well as 5 different traditional herbal concoctions were studied. Potentially clinically significant drug interactions were observed with St. John wort (16/24 studies), garlic (2/5 studies), and American ginseng (1 study). Research on NHP-drug interactions is limited in number and scope. With the exception of St. John wort, clinicians and the public do not have information that permits strong inferences about interactions between NHPs and conventional medications.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://herbalscienceresearch.com/keyword/clinical-trial">clinical trial</category>
 <category domain="http://herbalscienceresearch.com/keyword/herbal">herbal</category>
 <category domain="http://herbalscienceresearch.com/keyword/interaction">interaction</category>
 <category domain="http://herbalscienceresearch.com/keyword/pharmacokinetic">pharmacokinetic</category>
 <category domain="http://herbalscienceresearch.com/keyword/systematic-review">systematic review</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jun 2006 04:01:33 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Site Editor</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">216 at http://herbalscienceresearch.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Unconventional anticancer agents: a systematic review of clinical trials.</title>
 <link>http://herbalscienceresearch.com/node/197</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?tmpl=NoSidebarfile&amp;amp;db=PubMed&amp;amp;cmd=Retrieve&amp;amp;list_uids=16382123&amp;amp;dopt=Abstract&quot;&gt;Unconventional anticancer agents: a systematic review of clinical trials.&lt;/a&gt;: J Clin Oncol. 2006 Jan 1;24(1):136-40  Authors:  Vickers AJ, Kuo J, Cassileth BR&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;PURPOSE: A substantial number of cancer patients turn to treatments other than those recommended by mainstream oncologists in an effort to sustain tumor remission or halt the spread of cancer. These unconventional approaches include botanicals, high-dose nutritional supplementation, off-label pharmaceuticals, and animal products. The objective of this study was to review systematically the methodologies applied in clinical trials of unconventional treatments specifically for cancer. METHODS: MEDLINE 1966 to 2005 was searched using approximately 200 different medical subject heading terms (eg, alternative medicine) and free text words (eg, laetrile). We sought prospective clinical trials of unconventional treatments in cancer patients, excluding studies with only symptom control or nonclinical (eg, immune) end points. Trial data were extracted by two reviewers using a standardized protocol. RESULTS: We identified 14,735 articles, of which 214, describing 198 different clinical trials, were included. Twenty trials were phase I, three were phase I and II, 70 were phase II, and 105 were phase III. Approximately half of the trials investigated fungal products, 20% investigated other botanicals, 10% investigated vitamins and supplements, and 10% investigated off-label pharmaceuticals. Only eight of the phase I trials were dose-finding trials, and a mere 20% of phase II trials reported a statistical design. Of the 27 different agents tested in phase III, only one agent had a prior dose-finding trial, and only for three agents was the definitive study initiated after the publication of phase II data. CONCLUSION: Unconventional cancer treatments have not been subject to appropriate early-phase trial development. Future research on unconventional therapies should involve dose-finding and phase II studies to determine the suitability of definitive trials.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://herbalscienceresearch.com/keyword/cancer">cancer</category>
 <category domain="http://herbalscienceresearch.com/keyword/clinical-trial">clinical trial</category>
 <category domain="http://herbalscienceresearch.com/keyword/herbal">herbal</category>
 <category domain="http://herbalscienceresearch.com/keyword/systematic-review">systematic review</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jun 2006 03:57:37 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Site Editor</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">197 at http://herbalscienceresearch.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>A review of controlled trials in the pharmacological treatment of premature ejaculation.</title>
 <link>http://herbalscienceresearch.com/node/129</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?tmpl=NoSidebarfile&amp;amp;db=PubMed&amp;amp;cmd=Retrieve&amp;amp;list_uids=16212710&amp;amp;dopt=Abstract&quot;&gt;A review of controlled trials in the pharmacological treatment of premature ejaculation.&lt;/a&gt;: Int J STD AIDS. 2005 Oct;16(10):651-8 Authors:  Richardson D, Green J, Ritcheson A, Goldmeier D, Harris JR&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Premature ejaculation is a common sexual problem which presents to genitourinary (GU) medicine services. Five main treatment approaches have been used in clinical trials: behavioural therapy, antidepressants, phosphodiesterase-5 (PDE5) inhibitors, topical anaesthetic agents and alpha-blockers. We have carried out a systematic review of published pharmacological trials. All antidepressants appeared to delay ejaculation to some extent at all doses. Anaesthetic creams appeared to be as successful in slowing ejaculation as antidepressants without systemic side-effects, although some patients did experience erectile problems or unpleasant local symptoms. Anecdotally, behavioural therapy is effective and appears to have long-lasting efficacy. There is a need for quality comparative trial of behavioural therapy, topical anaesthetic agents and antidepressants, including appropriate measures of relapse, follow-up and acceptability of continuing long-term treatment.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://herbalscienceresearch.com/keyword/herbal">herbal</category>
 <category domain="http://herbalscienceresearch.com/keyword/men">men</category>
 <category domain="http://herbalscienceresearch.com/keyword/systematic-review">systematic review</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jun 2006 03:42:31 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Site Editor</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">129 at http://herbalscienceresearch.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
